Changes in Political Culture Between 2004 and 2008 Essay Example for Free

Changes in Political Culture Between 2004 and 2008 EssayAfter variant all of the lecture nones and spending quite some time browsing the internet, I found 3 things that dramatically changed between the 2004 and 2008 Presidential picks. Media exercise, technology and the change in demographics played major roles in the 2008 elections. Media influence was the number one change between 2004 and 2008. Although the media played a big part of the 2004 elections, that election does not comp are to the media frenzy of 2008. In 2008, tv set became the primary medium for conveying the campaign to Americans. The television carry de taked hours a day to observing every small item, almost all of it live. Little was verbalise back and forth between the campaigns that were not inform quickly by a media outlet. Across the medium, 67% of the time on cable came from talk format or live standup. Only 23% came from reported pieces in which correspondents have control of the message. (2) Wha t press stories made a difference in 2008? There was much reporting on the background and character of candidates during the primaries, when the process of discovery was new and went on longer.Yet arguably, the dickens most important stories about Obama came from a church DVD (the sermon by the Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr. ) and a tape made by a blogger doubling as a supporter (Mayhill Fowler) ,working for Huffington Post, who recorded Obamas carryment about bitter small-town voters. The reporting on Sarah Palins background in Alaska by versatile news organizations probably represents the most memorable example of first-hand, pro-active reporting into candidate backgrounds during the general election in 2008. 2) These are just a few of the examples of how the media bandwagon was so influential during 2008. It does not matter the party linkup or beliefs, we all followed a certain media outlet of choice during that time. The due south change between 2004 and 2008 was that Americans immovable to get out and vote. Mainly due to the media frenzy, Americans stormed the ballot boxes none the less. Demographics were a very close second to the media during this time of change. The change in numbers is almost unbelievable.The electorate in last years presidential election was the most racially and heathenally diverse in U. S. history, with nearly one-in-four votes cast by non- whites, according to a new analysis of Census Bureau data by the Pew Research Center. (3) The unprecedented variety show of the electorate last year was driven by increases both in the number and in the turnout rate of minority eligible voters. Much of the surge in mysterious voter participation in 2008 was driven by increased participation among black women and younger voters.The voter turnout rate among eligible black female voters increased 5. 1 percentage points, from 63. 7% in 2004 to 68. 8% in 2008. Among all racial, ethnic and gender groups, black women had the highest voter turnout rate in Novembers election a first. Overall, whites made up 76. 3% of the record 131 million people who voted in Novembers presidential election, while blacks made up 12. 1%, Hispanics 7. 4% and Asians 2. 5%. The white share is the lowest ever, yet is still higher than the 65. 8% white share of the total U.S. population. (3) The third and final thing that changed between the 2004 and 2008 Presidential elections was technology, especially the internet and hearty media sites. According to a survey conducted by Complete and released by Cisco about the influence of online moving-picture show and social media applications on Americans political engagement, the Internet was cited by 62 percent of respondents as a regularly used source for 2008 presidential election information and coverage, which was surpassed only by television (82%).Nearly a quarter of Americans (24%) says that they regularly learned something about the campaign from the Internet almost ikon the percentage from a co mparable point in the 2004 campaign (13%). (4) The Internet has, and has forever, changed the role of how presidential campaigns are fought, and how Americans attain their political news and information. Were it not for the Internet, Barack Obama would not be president. Were it not for the Internet, Barack Obama would not have been the nominee, tell Arianna Huffington, editor in chief of The Huffington Post, at a conference on How Politics and Web 2. Intersect, at the Web 2. 0 Summit in San Francisco. (4) The tools changed between 2004 and 2008. Barack Obama won every single caucus state that matters, and he did it because of those tools, because he was able to move thousands of people to organize, Joe Trippi said. (4) In conclusion I can unimpeachably see the major changes in political culture between the 2004 and 2008 Presidential elections. I also bank these changes started around the 2006 general elections and continued to progress for the next 2 years.It will be very kindle to watch the 2010 general elections and 2012 Presidential election to see how much influence the media and internet have. I hypothecate it will only progress until there is literally a live camera around anytime a candidate is in a public setting. Hopefully the trend of people getting out to vote is here to stay. For as Louis LAmour said To make democracy work, we must be a notion of participants, not simply observers.