The Use of Immorality in Order to Achieve Popular Rule Essay -- essays

Throughout The Prince and The Discourses of Livy, Niccolo Machiavelli demonstrates multiple theories and advocacies as to why ordinary regain is important to the success of a state. Popular rule is a end point that will be wontd to define an indirect way to govern the people of a state. In show to rule the masses, a draw must please the people or revolts will occur, causing havoc and a lack of stability in ones state. During some(prenominal) written works, Machiavelli stresses the importance of obedience and order needed for a state, and peculiarly for a leader to be successful. Machiavelli thoroughly states that anything and everything must be through to keep the peace of the masses, even if acts of immorality ar lend oneselfd. However, instead of advocating immorality, Machiavelli is reflexion that to serve the people and the state well, a linguistic rule must non restrict himself to conventional standards of morality. His use of immoral tactics in leaders would appe ar to be un common however the acts of immorality have limitations and are done solely to avoid displeasing the masses or creating indisposition. wherefore it is acceptable to practice immorality if it is done further to a underage number of constituents, if it is not repeated, and if it is performed to please and benefit the public. It is these limitations that prove Machiavelli is arguing that the use of immoral tactics, to rule the people and in turn be control by the people, is needed. He suggests that if the majority of the population is unhappy with a leader, that fussy leaders rule would be in jeopardy, thus locomote victim to popular rule. The first justification for the use of immorality is that it is only practiced upon a small number of residents. Machiavelli summarizes that it is better for a regulation to be immoral to a few of his subjects and prevent disorder from counterpane because disorder will damage the community as a exclusively more than it will damag e a few individuals in insulate acts of immorality. The priority of the leader is to maintain order and act to prevent disorder because, the whole community suffers if there are riots, while to maintain order the ruler only has to execute one or two individuals? (51). Citizens of a community would much rather live in a quiet and orderly world which exemplifies how a ruler is actually a knuckle down to the people. It... ...rder, brought unity and made the state as a whole faithfulness abiding and peaceful.Overall Machiavellis perspective does seem harsh and refrigerated at times, but he proves to be an avid supporter of popular rule throughout his writings. He believes in popular rule so strongly that he states it is acceptable to use immoral means to fall upon a peaceful government. If the citizens are not happy and feel their ruler disregards their wishes then the populace could become enraged and therefore, the ruler would not be executing his power of indirect popular rule . Machiavelli states that in order to fall upon the necessity of popular rule, a leader will have to standard outside a moral sphere and do whatever it takes to chance upon popular rule. Machiavelli puts clear and strict limits on acts of immorality in leadership. The use of immorality is only acceptable in order to achieve overall good for a government. Engaging in immorality for the sake of popular rule is justified because it is done to serve the people and the state successfully. working CitedMachiavelli. Selected Political Writings. Trans David Wooton. Indianapolis Hackett, 1994.