Living with Strangers Analysis

B. life hi fiction With Strangers In 2011 8,244,910 hoi polloi were living in one of the linked States most famous cities New York. New York has the highest population density in the United States with over 27000 bulk per squ be mile and it is estimated that 200 languages are utter in the city. In a city with so hu homo racey people, varied cultures, and languages converts may defend difficulties with growing accustomed to a city beneficial of strangers. The Ameri contribute novelist and essayist, Siri Hustvedt, debates in the essay Living With Strangers from The New York Times, 2002, the complications and challenges an urbanite must overmaster in a large citys society.The main foundation in the essay is the ability to show humanity in a city full of strangers. In this essay I go away meditate and comment on the essay Living With Strangers. By way of creation Siri Hustvedt describes how everyone in her hometown, Minnesota, greeted when they met even though it was any(p renominal)body they did not deal. The author promptly moves on to an anecdote from when she first moved to New York. The anecdote describes how she in her apartment is a witness to her neighbours private acts such as a heated argument and walking around in underwear.Even though she sees and hears these inside moments she does not know the people around her and and so she is living with strangers. What Siri Hustvedt by chance encounters in her apartment may seem transcendent alone at least her apartments walls protect her from a confrontation with the people she is overhearing. These walls cannot protect her in public and Siri Hustvedt finds herself in intimate contact with people she does not know In my former life, such closeness belonged entirely to boyfriends and family. (Ll. 6-17) To survive these transcendent experiences the New Yorkers follow the unverbalised law take a chance IT ISNT HAPPENING. Siri Hustvedt tells ternary stories where either she or someone she kno ws has see the pretend-it-isnt-happening law. The first story is from her friend who had just arrived to New York when a skirt wearing only a flimsy bathrobe entered the bus he was on. In a smaller city the almost naked woman would have drawn attention to herself, but not in New York. non even when she started yelling to the highest degree her token, the New Yorkers opposeed.Siri Hustvedts friend did, however, react because he was new in New York and therefore had not learned the pretend-it-isnt-happening law. The second story is Siri Hustvedts own from about a class ago. She was in a train where a man started yelling about a very sore subject for New Yorkers 9/11. He said it was Gods punishment for their sins. Siri Hustvedt describes the episode as ill at ease(predicate) I could whole tone the cold, stiff resistance to his words among the passengers, but not a single one of us turned to look at him (ll. 3-35). In this story the unspoken law is very clear. If the mans state ment had been said in the news or written on the Internet it would probably have created a big and abrasive discussion, but because it was in public the unspoken law overpowers the urge to speak up. Siri Hustvedts last story happened only a couple of weeks ago from when she wrote the essay. Her preserve and she were on a station waiting for a train. They sat at one end of a judicature. At the other end of the bench sat a man looking like someone you should avoid.Siri Hustvedt was rectify in avoiding the man for when he walked past them he spat in their direction and a bit of saliva hit Siri Hustvedt, but her keep up and she chose to ignore it. The three examples support the pretend-it-isnt-happening law. Siri Hustvedt frequently uses of adjectives makes the examples seem legitimateistic to the reader. That the stories are from Siri Hustvedts point of view gives a personal connection and therefore she makes use of ethos, which makes the reader able to relate to Siri Hustvedt. Al so the fact that the three anecdotes had happened over a period makes it relevant.So far the essay has had a tiny view on the urban living. Siri Hustvedt has by ostracise adjectives and adverbs, such as howling, shocked, ashamed, cold, stiff, tired, empty, hostility, and terribly, made the urban living seem lonely and at some point horrifying. In the third and final part of the article Siri Hustvedt discusses when and what will happen if people do not follow the pretend-it-isnt-happening law. Taking bring through may be viewed as courageous or merely inconclusive () (l. 53) this statement is once again supported my anecdotes from the urban life.The first story is by Siri Hustvedts husband who was a witness to a man being threatened on his life because he asked some other man to put out his cigarette. Even though it was only a literal attack it can have horrible consequences because, as Siri Hustvedt puts it it carries no honourable insight into when to act and when not to act (ll. 72-73), you will never know when you are being attacked for not obeying the unspoken law. Siri Hustvedt moves on to telling another story, which contrary to the previous story has a happy ending.Her daughter, Sofie, was riding the pipe when a man loudly declared his love for her. Sofie is a intersection of the pretend-it-isnt-happening law and therefore she did as all the other passengers did, she ignored the man. The website made Sofie very uncomfortable until the passenger next to her broke the unspoken law with a witty remark. This made Sofie feel better it elevate my daughter out of the solitary misery that comes from being the object of unwished-for attention among strangers who collectively participate in a game of erasure. (Ll. 3-95) By telling this story Siri Hustvedt gives a new alternative to the pretend-it-isnt-happening law. The passenger chose to end being a part of the passive audience and instead he helped the girl. By doing so the passenger does not only make Sofie feel good, but he also proves Siri Hustvedts final point, which is that, the pretend-it-isnt-happening law can also lead to something good. Siri Hustvedt finds the closing whether to act or not exciting. discover of necessity the New Yorkers often choose not to act, but when they do it opens up to another understanding of a persons nature or another worldview.In Minnesota people greet with the same signified as New Yorkers ignores others presences. Therefore it is not possible to overcome the restriction of strangers in Minnesota, but in New York people become real if they do not obey the unspoken law. Siri Hustvedt begins with a negative and diminutive view on the urban living, but in the end Siri Hustvedt turns the negative to the positive and a good urban living becomes a decision for the individual New Yorkers. If you choose to overcome the barrier of strangers you will experience a presence of the people surrounding you.